Welcome!

SDN Journal Authors: Yeshim Deniz, Liz McMillan, Elizabeth White, Pat Romanski, TJ Randall

Related Topics: @DevOpsSummit, Linux Containers, Containers Expo Blog, SDN Journal

@DevOpsSummit: Blog Post

Keep CALMS and Release More By @TrevParsons | @DevOpsSummit [#DevOps]

How to Keep CALMS and Release More!

How to Keep CALMS and Release More

DevOps is fundamentally changing.

It is no longer considered a fad by those working with the latest development tools. Now, DevOps emphasizes people and processes as much as the cool tools, and there are many different approaches to bringing them together.

If you Google search for "DevOps flow," you will find lots of flow diagrams and methodologies. While each one highlights different priorities and names, they all have the same general themes.

  1. Start with people
  2. Bring in automation
  3. Stay lean
  4. Measure everything
  5. Share

This strategy is called the CALMS approach.

Keep CALMS and Release more

CALMS vs ITSM?
CALMS grew out of the need to bridge the gap between ITSM principles and DevOps. The challenge faced by those familiar with ITSM, who might view as an alternative to DevOps, is understanding where they differ. If the differences are not immediately obvious when viewing the ITSM documentation examples, they will be as you explore the general concepts of the methodology.

The CALMS acronym will help illustrate these different methodologies at a quick glance, and as you observe culture is the first point, it quickly becomes clear that a side-by-side comparison is not possible.

ITSM is generally focused on documentation, change control, and repeatability, where DevOps is focused on people who drive results. With ITSM, repeatability is a main component, but the structure and processes are not primary objectives.

What Does CALMS Stand For?
Culture

Culture is not something you implement; it is the natural environment that houses the entire development team. Entire means all the developers, QA, AND operations. In this eco-system of people and tools, the culture is necessary to remove barriers and facilitate collaboration to hit team objectives.

There is nothing fluffy about culture.

Culture plays a major role in the success of the business so getting it right is important. In the case of DevOps where red tape, time spent on needless activities, and with the silos of responsibilities, bad culture hinders goal completion and company objectives.

Automation
Once you have culture in place you can focus on automation. This is not just creating scripts for infrastructure or using Selenium for functional testing.

Automation is the idea that you should program everything.

Find a way to lead all new initiatives with automation and then think about automation constantly to help scale.

Lean
As you build automation you also have to remember to be lean.

Running lean means keeping everything to a minimum.

Tools, meetings, and even sprints should all be kept lean. This also is often part of the culture, when you are a minimalist, and every tool, and process you select has a purpose.

It also applies to your teams.

You must keep teams to an effective size to avoid diminishing returns from too many cooks in the kitchen. If the application complexity warrants larger teams, then break them into sub groups, as many large organizations have done.

Measurement
Measurement is the glue that keeps it all together. When you are a lean organization automating everything, you can lose the ability to remember and document it all. Naysayers of DevOps can quickly point to this challenge as being a reason to avoid DevOps, and they are not wrong.

If a team does not have visibility into everything, something will eventually go horribly wrong.

When measurement is implemented correctly this should not happen. If you measure everything and think in terms of reporting on your development team and processes, you will have the ability to analyze and correlate all processes, tools, and production data together.

However, this cannot be done in the traditional spreadsheet style system. In the minimalist organization, you do not have time to inventory everything, which is prone to human error anyway.

Measurement has to happen using more advanced tools for data collection, like a log analysis platform. One that goes beyond event monitoring and reporting, and can push insights to you. This way you can avoid thinking about pulling information on regular tasks or maintenance, and can delegate the effort to the platform. Once you know what you regularly need to observe, you can build a dashboard that (in a glance) tells you everything you need to know.

Sharing
With all this data, you need to disseminate what is learned, what went wrong, and how to correct.

The benefit of breaking down the walls between developers and operations is the information flow becomes bi-directional, and you avoid the concept of "throwing things over the fence". However, this is worthless if information is not shared proactively.

Sharing is not just reporting facts, it is regular exchanging of ideas across teams.

Developers can suggest QA and operations try new tools to improve production quality, and operations can suggest functionality that helps back-end management.

Use CALMS for Loose Direction, not GPS
All DevOps flows similar to CALMS serve the same general function, which is to be used as a guide, and not a definitive answer.

What is unique with the CALMS description of DevOps is the emphasis on culture.

Culture is not easy, nor straight forward. It takes time to mold unless you have the luxury of hiring all awesome people. Sometimes it is awkward to start, but eventually becomes habit.

Because CALMS is a guide, not an answer, you must remember that it will not be perfect.

I personally believe CALMS is missing an R and an I. CRIALMS, (which sounds like something from World of Warcraft). Results and iterations are also incredibly important. Both, like the above, are culture and directives in parallel.

By nature if you are results driven, you will be analytical, and your results will come faster with leaner operations that collaborate well. In order to execute with the this framework, you need to evaluate your progress on small fast chunks; iterations.

This exercise is important not because CALMS should, or should not, be a standard we throw around like candy, but because when new movements come along (like DevOps) there needs to be a path from the hype to the practice. CALMS helps those who have lived operations and those who do not know what operations even is, but realize they have to work with them.

More Stories By Trevor Parsons

Trevor Parsons is Chief Scientist and Co-founder of Logentries. Trevor has over 10 years experience in enterprise software and, in particular, has specialized in developing enterprise monitoring and performance tools for distributed systems. He is also a research fellow at the Performance Engineering Lab Research Group and was formerly a Scientist at the IBM Center for Advanced Studies. Trevor holds a PhD from University College Dublin, Ireland.

CloudEXPO Stories
With more than 30 Kubernetes solutions in the marketplace, it's tempting to think Kubernetes and the vendor ecosystem has solved the problem of operationalizing containers at scale or of automatically managing the elasticity of the underlying infrastructure that these solutions need to be truly scalable. Far from it. There are at least six major pain points that companies experience when they try to deploy and run Kubernetes in their complex environments. In this presentation, the speaker will detail these pain points and explain how cloud can address them.
Discussions of cloud computing have evolved in recent years from a focus on specific types of cloud, to a world of hybrid cloud, and to a world dominated by the APIs that make today's multi-cloud environments and hybrid clouds possible. In this Power Panel at 17th Cloud Expo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists addressed the importance of customers being able to use the specific technologies they need, through environments and ecosystems that expose their APIs to make true change and transformation possible.
"Space Monkey by Vivent Smart Home is a product that is a distributed cloud-based edge storage network. Vivent Smart Home, our parent company, is a smart home provider that places a lot of hard drives across homes in North America," explained JT Olds, Director of Engineering, and Brandon Crowfeather, Product Manager, at Vivint Smart Home, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
We are seeing a major migration of enterprises applications to the cloud. As cloud and business use of real time applications accelerate, legacy networks are no longer able to architecturally support cloud adoption and deliver the performance and security required by highly distributed enterprises. These outdated solutions have become more costly and complicated to implement, install, manage, and maintain.SD-WAN offers unlimited capabilities for accessing the benefits of the cloud and Internet. SD-WAN helps enterprises to take advantage of the exploding landscape of cloud applications and services, due to its unique capability to support all things cloud related.
In an era of historic innovation fueled by unprecedented access to data and technology, the low cost and risk of entering new markets has leveled the playing field for business. Today, any ambitious innovator can easily introduce a new application or product that can reinvent business models and transform the client experience. In their Day 2 Keynote at 19th Cloud Expo, Mercer Rowe, IBM Vice President of Strategic Alliances, and Raejeanne Skillern, Intel Vice President of Data Center Group and GM, discussed how clients in this new era of innovation can apply data, technology, plus human ingenuity to springboard to advance new business value and opportunities.